I recently attended the Virtual School Symposium hosted by iNACOL (the International Association for K-12 Online Learning). It was a good conference, and I came away with a new sense of the direction online learning will be taking as we approach the end of the first decade of the 21st century.
One session I attended really had some things to think about. It was conducted by folks from Transition High School in Milwaukee. The session was about disruptive learning, and this school is truly following the disruptive learning philosophy. Created as a place for students who have previously been incarcerated or have otherwise been in “trouble”, this high school has had to develop true education reform.
There are many great things going on at Transition High School. At first glance, an educator might say “okay, great, but how does that apply to my school?”
To answer that question, I’m going to talk about the school’s “restoration of consciousness” theme. The programs that surround this theme include a three-strand approach.
First, there is the “cypher” portion, which educates the students in that school about some of the stereotypes and cultural issues that may affect their own perception of their roles in society.
Next, is the “experiential” portion, which gives students an opportunity to experience things like camping, rock-climbing, and skiing – things they have never experienced before. These experiences serve to show students what truly living is all about, and in the process, they learn more about themselves and their own capacity to problem-solve and face challenges.
Last, there is a “community” component, where students do community service work and develop community partnerships that further enhance their understanding of what their role in society might be.
Yes, these programs have been developed for students who otherwise normally fall through the cracks. Nationwide statistics say that an extremely high number of these students will be dropouts. Transition High School students graduate 64% of the time, and many of them choose to pursue higher education.
However, I believe this type of program has a place in “traditional” school settings, as well. As a high school teacher, I see students in my classroom who have, over the years, had their sense of awareness removed from them. They have forgotten why they want to learn, why they need to learn, how to set goals and what it really takes to achieve those goals. In an earlier post on this blog (Teaching Truth #11: Is it our fault?), I speculated that high school students:
“… leave their strengths behind and since they aren’t any good at those things we are forcing them to do, they lose interest and become mediocre at success.”
It’s time we restore consciousness – not just to our students, but to ourselves.
We can do this by focusing more on the student as a whole, rather than limiting our impact to our 45 to 90 minutes with them each day. Developing a school-wide program, tailored to meet the needs of the students in your community, can be the first step toward a global restoration of consciousness.






Do you have all the answers?
August 6, 2009 · 1 Comment
I’ve posted here and elsewhere the news that I’m returning to the classroom this year. I’m very excited about this, and have been doing a lot of reflection on my previous experiences, on what I want to change, and on teaching styles in general.
Because of this reflection, whenever I’m in a room with other educators, I’m always reflecting on their comments and actions, as well. One of the things that has come up recently happens to be one of my pet peeves when it comes to educators, so I thought I’d write about it here. I’m writing in response to teachers who decide to remove content from their curriculum based on the fact that they think they don’t know enough about it to teach it.
Do you have all the answers?
I certainly hope not. How dull would a classroom be that didn’t give students room to discover? How much creativity and how many thinking skills can we kill as educators who want our students to ingest information and regurgitate it at test time? I’ve experienced teachers who were not willing to say “I don’t know” in answer to a student’s question — teachers who would rather not introduce a topic if they themselves know little about it. Why is it that these teachers feel a need to be the single source of information in their classroom? When did we, as a whole, decide that teaching was all about being the expert in the classroom?
Of course, we have to be able to seem as though we know our subject well enough to teach it, but won’t my students learn more from me by witnessing my willingness to reveal my shortcomings? The sciences I teach have vast amounts of information — even genius’ like Einstein would never know all of it. Pretending to know it all makes me an imposter. Won’t my students retain what they learn longer if they have the opportunity to teach me or others in their classroom about what they discover?
If I refuse to let students know the vast amount of information that is out there for them to discover, aren’t I cheating them of opportunities to stretch their own minds and create? Who am I to rob them of the challenge of expanding their own knowledge and exploring the topics that interest them?
My first-day-of-school speech always contains this sentence: “I want you to question everything I tell you”. Great scientists did not come from children who blindly believed everything they were told. They came from those who said “I don’t believe the world is flat” or “I don’t believe Earth is the center of the universe”. My goal as a teacher is to give my students just enough knowledge to run with it. Then I stand back and watch the incredible directions they go. I would never be able to come up with those directions on my own.
Do you have all the answers? . . . Let them run with it!
→ 1 CommentCategories: Commentary · Teaching Truths
Tagged: first day of school, teaching philosophy